Farah Mozaffari, M. Ghorbani —
After the US aggression attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, US President Trump said, “Our forces carried out major attacks on the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan facilities,” adding, “The purpose of these attacks was to destroy Iran’s enrichment capabilities. Iran must move towards peace.” “The attack on Iran is a great success,” he claimed, adding, “Three of Iran’s nuclear sites have been completely destroyed.”
Trump threatened Iran, saying that “Iran is either facing peace or tragedy,” and said, “If peace is not achieved, we will pursue other goals.”
Speaking at a NATO summit in The Hague on Wednesday, June 25, Trump said the strikes had led to the “destruction” of Iran’s nuclear capability and delayed its nuclear program “for decades”. He added that if Iran’s nuclear facilities had not been destroyed in the US attack, Tehran would not have accepted a ceasefire in the war with Israel.
He reiterated at the Hague summit that the attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities was “devastating” and took them “by surprise.”
Trump and his allies in West Asia called this blatant aggression “preemptive” and, as always, said that no country in the region has the right to have an atomic bomb except Israel, and they did not stop there, saying that Iran should not have a nuclear fuel production cycle.
Netanyahu has been saying for almost 20 years that Iran will have an atomic bomb within two weeks.
Today, after passing through these twelve days of imposed war, we understand very well what has happened to the Palestinian people, especially the brave people of Gaza, during these two years, they are exposed to brutal attacks day and night.
They attacked our nuclear facilities with cruise missiles and anti-bunkers. In addition, just like in Gaza, they attacked our television stations, private homes, ambulances, and Red Crescent centers, and one of Tehran’s most populous squares, Quds Square, and as usual, they shamelessly said, “Israel has the right to defend itself.”
They have mobilized their propagandists around the world and repeatedly reiterated that no one sympathizes with the Iranian people, while the world’s public opinion, especially in the West Asian region, is fully aligned with Iran and is aware that Iran has responded to Israel’s aggression with its policy of strategic patience , and for this reason, they sympathize with the Iranian people.
We all know that Israel has never implemented any of the UN declarations or requests. Peace requires impartial enforcement of international law.
Today, when the role of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has become clearer for the people of our country and even for our statesmen than in the past, what should be done with the lessons we have learned from this attack and the role of the Agency?
Now that the United States openly proposes the overthrow of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the eventual disintegration of Iran as its strategy, and does not consider this strategy to be contingent on the change of governments, whether democratic or republican, and is not compatible with Iran, and has proven it with repeated broken promises, how can we sit at the negotiating table with them? Has the U.S. left any ground for trust?
It is no secret that Trump and his administration are not ignoring the restrictions imposed by lawmakers in the U.S. Congress. Several laws to impose economic sanctions on Iran (ISA) have already been signed into law by the president.
Now that Trump has claimed that he has “completely destroyed Iran’s three nuclear sites,” what should be negotiated with the United States? Have our statesmen realized that negotiations with the United States have often been used deceptively? And they have not yet learned a lesson?
How many times should the Supreme Leader of the Revolution repeat that “America is not trustworthy.” Why do some officials, despite all the inconclusive setbacks in the past years, still tie the solution to the problems to negotiations, without any tangible conditions, with the United States? If this is not sheer stupidity, it is treason.
July 25, 2025 —
سلام با پوزش تاریخ نشان داده است که « مذاکره » یکی از شیوههای مبارزه هست و بار در حین جنگ در کشور های مختلف و دوران های مختلف شاهد مذاکره طرفین بوده آیم …
اساس مذاکره کردن اگر مشکل اصلی تصور کنیم به خطا رفته این …
نتانیاهو هم مخالف مذاکره ایران و آمریکا بود ! و وقتی هم بعد پنج دوره مذاکره احساس کرد و بو کشید که احتمال توافق نسبی وجود دارد و خودش در صحنه خاورمیانه با این توافق منزوی خواهد شد ! قبل دوره ششم دست به ترور سرداران و دانشمند کرد و به ایران حمله کرد که مذاکره دور ششم را هوا کند که متاسفانه موفق هم شد ! موفق باشید ارادتمند کریم یزدانی راد
با سلام و تشکر از ابراز نظرتان،
در این نوشته صحبت از مذاکره «نسبه» شده است که اشاره به سخنان رهبر انقلاب دارد که اظهار داشت: « آنها در مذاکرات از شما نقد می خواهند ولی تنها به شما وعده می دهند و بعد زیر وعده شان می زنند.» (نقل به مضمون) البته می شود سخنان رهبر را پیدا کرد.
لذا در این نوشته نفس مذاکره نفی نشده است، بلکه مذاکره ای که در آن یک طرف همه چیز میگیرد و در ازای آن هیچ چیز ملموسی جز وعده به طرف مقابل نمی دهد را بیهوده می داند و تکرارش را در بهترین حالت بلاهت می داند.
تشکر